The Future of Risk
May 11 2012, 10:30 am
Coulter Lounge, International House
Francois Ewald / Ecole National d'Assurances "After Risk"
Pat O'Malley / University of Sydney "From Risk to Resilience: Technologies of the Self in the Age of Catastrophes"
Caitlin Zaloom / New York University "Volatility and the Problem of Planning a Life"
Chris Berk / University of Chicago
Julie Chu / University of Chicago
Robert Fairbanks, II / University of Chicago
Bernard Harcourt / University of Chicago
Kaushik Sunder-Rajan / University of Chicago
Evalyn Tennant / University of Chicago
Kevin Thompson /DePaul University
Christien Tompkins / University of Chicago
Anwen Tormey / University of Chicago
Notions of risk have become central to contemporary forms of governmentality and been the subject of extensive research and theorizing over the past decade. Much scholarship on risk has focused on the late nineteenth century displacement of ideas of individual responsibility and fault by methods of cost distribution, such as workmen’s compensation schemes, that would distribute the burden of accidents and risk more evenly throughout society without paying close attention to the attribution of blame. After the mid-twentieth century, thought regarding risk and insurance began to reimagine individual responsibility by using risk calculations and prediction to determine individual outcomes and responsibilize lower-level employees and actors. Expert forms of knowledge concerning individual risk (medical, juridical, scientific, psychiatric, carceral) are institutionalized as a way to assuage popular insecurities and, by the turn of the century, we see notions of risk beginning to be usurped by principles of precaution, cultures of safety, and other techniques to address uncertainty. These developments represented different reactions, at different periods, to groundswells of social insecurity and fear of uncertainty. They emerge alongside a proliferation of predictive technologies whose actuarial compass has included increasingly precise methods of measurement and future-inflected statistical prognostication. But, even as technicist modes of knowing and deciding expand to saturate every aspect of individual life, popular anxieties have, by and large, not been soothed by these developments. Quite the contrary, there appears to be growing anxiety, reflected by the twin specters of social disorder and individual precarcity that loom large on a daily basis. The purpose of this symposium is to explore the future of these categories of risk, uncertainty, measurement, and prediction. Will these concepts continue to be organizing principles for forms of governmentality or will they be replaced by other categories and techniques? How might we understand the impulsion towards ever-more secure modes of knowing, risk-reduction, and certainty at a moment when risk-taking, contingency and uncertainty fuel both the ideological and economic rationale of the neoliberal present? To address these questions, this symposium will bring practitioners from the field of insurance, law and risk-management into conversation with a multi-disciplinary group of scholars and students from the University of Chicago. Rather than focusing on the contradictory co-implication of these divinatory logics, this symposium will attempt to grapple with their precondition: belief in the certainty of knowledge and in the crystallization of truth forms.
This event is organized by Bernard Harcourt (Political Science) and Anwen Tormey (Anthropology) and is free and open to the public.
If you need further information or assistance to attend, please contact email@example.com